When Custody Becomes Counterparty Risk
FTX and the case for verifiable self-custody
Project Overview
FTX remains the canonical case for separating asset access from corporate promises. Senate testimony after the collapse described roughly $900 million of liquid assets against $9 billion of liabilities, alongside what bankruptcy leadership called a complete failure of corporate controls.
Liquid Assets
Liabilities
Control Failure
Results & Impact
The failure was not primarily cryptographic. It was a governance and custody failure in which users depended on solvency, internal books, related-party behavior, jurisdiction, and honest reporting that they could not independently verify.
- Reduced average response time by 68%
- Increased appointment bookings by 46%
- Lowered support workload by 58%
- Improved first-call resolution rates
- Created scalable systems for future business growth
- Delivered consistent customer experiences
Research & Analysis
Custodial convenience changes the user from an asset owner into an unsecured creditor. Withdrawals depend on the intermediary remaining solvent, cooperative, and operationally competent during stress.
Solution Implementation
Privatum keeps the spend rule cryptographic and distributed. The company operates a co-signer shard but never holds enough key material to move assets. No two shards, no transaction.
Key Achievements
This architecture does not ask users to trust a balance sheet. It asks them to verify a simple rule: Privatum cannot act alone, and recovery remains possible through an independent quorum.
Build private payments on Robinhood Chain
Read the research, explore the architecture, and follow the roadmap to native privacy.
